Apologetics,  My Background

Is Christianity True?

Is Christianity true? This is the single most important question any of us will ever answer in our lives. C.S. Lewis put it this way, “Christianity, if false, is of no importance, and if true, of infinite importance…”

The night my husband died, I lay in bed holding my daughter and silently screamed inside my head. My entire life was in tatters. A decade of prayer for my husband’s mental, emotional, and spiritual healing from PTSD, TBIs, and clinical depression following his twenty-year military career had been answered in a single horrific moment.

In a single horrific moment, my faith had to go from hopeful optimism to becoming a bedrock foundation for walking in faith when I could not see God's goodness in that moment. #apologetics #suffering #veteransuicide Share on X

“God, this? This?! This is the answer to all my years of prayers for him?? I don’t understand. How could this be the best answer for him, for me, for our family???”

And as I lay there railing against the Creator of the Universe, the Holy Spirit brought four facts to mind.

  1. The Universe didn’t create itself.
  2. The Universe didn’t design itself.
  3. We can’t get life from non-life.
  4. Jesus walked out of the grave.

“Okay, God if those four things are true, then I know you are real, and I can trust you with my life whether I feel like it right now or not. I believe, Lord, help my unbelief.”

If Christianity is true, then I could trust God even when my world was falling apart.

All the time I had spent learning apologetics, I thought that I was going to stumble on just the right fact or idea that would turn my husband’s mind toward Christ while I tried to love him in ways that would turn his heart. Instead, apologetics was what saved my faith when I was closest to walking away after losing him. In the horror of that tragedy, I realized either my beliefs are based in truth or they are worthless.

So are my four statements true?

1. The Universe didn’t create itself.

Both science and the Bible say that the universe had a beginning.

We can look at several factors, including the cosmic background radiation from the Big Bang and the red shift of galaxies moving away from us to know that our universe is expanding from a singular point when all space, time, and matter began to exist.

The Law of Causality says that everything that has a beginning must have a cause. The universe must have a cause that is outside of space, time, and matter. This creator must be all-powerful, intelligent, and personal.

This cause must be personal, as in a being with the ability to decide when to act, because forces act immediately. Gravity doesn’t decide when to start working. If gravity exists, we all fall down, period. Whatever caused the universe to begin had to choose when to create.

2. The Universe has a highly complex design.

Even a simple design like an arrowhead shows that it was created from a mind, by hands, for a purpose. If we can see design in a simple arrowhead, what does the incredibly complex design of the universe, our galaxy, our solar system, and our planet mean for the existence of a creator.

Christopher Hitchens, the famed atheist, said the fine-tuning or design argument is the strongest argument for God.

According to the team at Reasons to Believe, 1462 features of the cosmos, planetary systems, and galaxies, and our planet must fall with razor thin ranges for the possibility of life to exist. It takes too much faith to believe all 1462 of these characteristics are perfectly tuned for life, by chance.

The universe must have a designer who is creative, intelligent, and cares about His creation.

3. We cannot get life from non-life.

“The probability of getting one protein molecule (which has about 100 amino acids) by chance would be the same as a blindfolded man finding one marked grain of sand in the Sahara Desert three times in a row.” – Michael Behe. We would need 150-200 of these for the most simple DNA, which is just a step towards life, not life itself.

We need properly sequenced proteins to get DNA. In order to get properly sequenced proteins, we need DNA.

DNA is information, more elegant and complex than any computer code. We know information comes from a mind. The amount of information in the nucleus of a single celled organism would fill 30 encyclopedias.

“The probability of life originating from accident is comparable to the probability of the unabridged dictionary resulting from an explosion in a printing factory.” Ed Conklin, evolutionist, professor of biology, Princeton.

4. Jesus rose from the grave. Christianity rests on this fact.

The New Testament we have today is 98.33-99.5% accurate to the original manuscripts, according to textual scholars Wescott and Hort and Bruce Metzger.

The Resurrection makes the most sense of the evidence we have. Dr. Gary Habermas asked over 1400 scholars which facts surrounding the Resurrection they believed to be true. Over 90% of scholars, including those hostile to Christianity, attest to these four facts:

  1. Jesus died by crucifixion under Pontius Pilate during the reign of Tiberius Caesar. This is documented in Josephus and Tacitus, as well as the four Gospels: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.
  2. The disciples believed they saw the risen Jesus. He appeared to the women first, then to the disciples, then to 500 others who were alive to refute this testimony. They all knew if this was truth or fiction and went from frightened cowards to boldly proclaiming Christ’s resurrection despite persecution, torture, imprisonment, and death in most cases.
  3. James, the brother of Jesus, went from believing Jesus was out of his mind in Mark 3:21, to calling Him, Lord. He was a pious Jew who radically altered his faith and life to follow His brother as God. (It would take a lot to believe your sibling is God.)
  4. Saul from Tarsus was a powerful Jew. He had prestige and authority and believed he was persecuting people who were blaspheming His God. Until he met the risen Jesus on the way to Damascus. Then he was willing to suffer and die for this truth just like the other disciples.
  5. +1 (Only 80% of scholars agree to this one, but that’s pretty good) The tomb was empty. The tomb was known and guarded. If they could have produced Jesus’ body to stop the disciples from telling people He was the Messiah, the Jews or the Romans would have done so.

The answer to “Is Christianity true?” rests on this fact. Also, if Jesus fulfilled prophecy (He did) and prophesied His own death and resurrection, then He is God. We can take what he says to be true. And He affirms the Scripture to be the Word of God.

5. Lastly, laws require a lawgiver.

(Gary Habermas has a +1 for his minimal facts argument, so I can, too.)

We know there is a moral law, right and wrong. While we might disagree about the details, we all know some actions are wrong. Therefore, there must be a moral lawgiver who is just and cares about justice.

If there is no God, then nothing is right or wrong, only the moral consensus of culture. Hitler had moral consensus, but we all know his actions were immoral and evil.

Without God nothing is evil, just things we don’t like. And we all know there is evil in this world. Therefore, God must exist.

The God described by the creation and fine-tuning of the universes is spaceless, timeless, immaterial, all-powerful, all-knowing. The God described through creation of life and morality is detail oriented, creative, loving, and just. The Resurrection of Jesus proves this is the God of the Bible. These are just five of the many arguments for the God of the Bible. (And just a quick summary of each.) But if these five arguments are true, then Christianity is true, God is real, and you can trust Him with your life, as I have done with mine, even in the massive grief and challenges since losing my husband to suicide.

Each of my points can be defended in much longer form, but this is a quick take on each point. Enough truth is here to believe even if we don’t have answers to every possible objection.

Is Christianity True?

6 Comments

  • M.J

    Hello!
    I just ran across your blog after I saw Vel (Club Schadenfreude) talking about it. Don’t worry; I am not a fan of her. I’ve debated her before and ended up having to ban her from commenting on my blog because of how condescending and unhinged her comments were (she even wrote a hit piece on me in October, which I found to be a comical achievement). On the bright side, my conversations with her inspired me to start writing about Christian apologetics and I’ve learned so much from it. It also attracted another atheist (the dude who calls himself Ark who I saw also commenting here), who I unfortunately also had to introduce to the ban button after he started crassly verbally abusing an anonymous commentor who tried to debate him. Sadly, it seems that anytime you talk about anything involving Christianity, people are going to come after you, but Jesus predicted this in the Bible. The best thing you can do is ignore them when they start getting too unruly to talk, block them if need be, and take it in stride and use it for good. I love what you’re doing here; keep up the good work.

    (P.S. I read your post on Mormonism and thought it was pretty good. One resource I would recommend for learning some more about Mormonism and what refutes it is the YouTube channel, Expedition Bible. There are two documentary-length videos there with the first debunking the existence of the tribes in the Book of Mormon and the second debunking the prophecies and supposed inerrancy of the Book of Mormon. In fact, the guy even quotes President Hinkley (who was the 15th president of the LDS) as admitting that Mormons do not believe in the Jesus of the Bible.)

    • themamapologist

      I’m glad you were brought here even if it was done through someone who is clearly angry with God and hates Christianity. Where did you see Vel speaking about me? I don’t know her at all and don’t know how she found my site when I started it or why she seems intent on arguing with me.

      • M.J

        https://clubschadenfreude.com/2025/05/06/not-so-polite-dinner-conversation-a-typical-christian-parent/

        Here’s the link to the post where I found out about your blog. If you go to October 2024 on her website, you can find her hit piece on me as well.

        From my previous conversations with her and from seeing her blog, she seems like the type who is just triggered by Christianity in general. She had a very bad experience with the church, which she wrote about, and now seems intent on putting down and slandering anyone who happens to speak about Christianity in a positive light. Like I said earlier, it got so bad on my blog that I had to block her to get her to go away.

        How she found you, I have no clue. The first time I ran into her was when I was commenting on another post from someone else where she had left a comment. From there, it was all downhill. Maybe something similar happened to you and that’s how she figured it out? Another possibility is maybe she found you on WordPress Reader or something. That’s the best I can figure.

        • themamapologist

          Wow – I went and read the “hit post” against you. And it’s like arguing in circles. She doesn’t seem to understand why her points against Christianity don’t really represent orthodox views. She never directly answers an objection, like about the Big Bang. What caused it to “bang”? Saying there is no historical evidence for the Bible is so patently false that I’m pretty shocked she made that claim. I would imagine she found me through WordPress Reader as well. I don’t know how to block her from commenting, but for now, I have told her I won’t approve or respond to any of her future comments. Ark is in the same boat. Even if I were 100% wrong (which I’m not), there is no point in spending time in conversation with someone who doesn’t seek to understand or converse politely. Nothing I could say can undo the pain and hurt a Christian caused her. She has to let Jesus do that. Glad to have you here MJ.

          • M.J

            Thanks!

            That was pretty much the same conclusion that I came to, especially since between school, keeping a good upload schedule, life, etc. I didn’t have time to keep responding almost daily to either of their complaints. It just wasn’t sustainable.

            To block people from commenting, go to settings, click discussions, scroll down a bit and you’ll see two boxes: comment moderation and disallowed comment keys. Just type in their usernames or related keywords and hit the “save changes” button. It won’t completely get rid of their comments, but it’ll send them to the trash bin.

          • themamapologist

            Agreed, it seems she has at least ten new objections for every one I answer. In a comment I won’t publish, said a renowned archaeologist was “someone quite ignorant.” I’ll link his Wikipedia page here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson_Glueck I am not going to argue with someone who ignores experts with whom they disagree. I doubt Vel is an expert in ancient archaeology. Thanks for the support and help.

We welcome polite, intelligent commentary! But will often address objections or refutations in a separate post for clarity. Thank you for visiting. I hope you are inspired to study further as am I.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.